Catchment News

River Flow and Ecology Case Study: The Lotic-invertebrate Index for Flow Evaluation (LIFE) in Irish Rivers

This article explores a case study from the EPA-funded research project on biological tools for assessing the impact of river flow on ecology in Ireland, led by Atlantic Technological University.

Research Project

Atlantic Technological University, led by Martin Gammell and his team, carried out the EPA-funded research project Biological Tools to Measure the Impact of Flow on Ecology in Irish Rivers. The study, now published on the EPA website, explores how biological indicators—such as macroinvertebrates, fish, and macrophytes—can assess the ecological impacts of changes in river flow.

The following article presents a case study from the project, focusing on the adaptation of the Lotic-invertebrate Index for Flow Evaluation (LIFE) for use in Irish rivers.

River Flow and Ecology Case Study: The Lotic-invertebrate Index for Flow Evaluation (LIFE) in Irish Rivers

Understanding Flow and Ecology

Flow is an important determinant of the biological community in a river. Therefore, changes in flow, due to factors such as instream barriers, climate change or water abstraction, for example, may have negative impacts on river communities, and it is important to be able to monitor such impacts. The EPA-funded project, Biological Tools to Measure the Impact of Flow on Ecology in Irish Rivers, aimed to develop a number of different methods to monitor flow-ecology relationships in Irish rivers, using macroinvertebrates, fish and macrophytes. Project Manager Martin Gammell is based at the Marine and Freshwater Research Centre at Atlantic Technological University in Galway, and prior to that he worked with the Environment Agency in England, as an ecological appraisal officer monitoring rivers in the east of England.

“During my time with the Environment Agency in England, I regularly used the Lotic-invertebrate Index for Flow Evaluation (LIFE) technique, which had been developed by some of my Environment Agency colleagues for monitoring flow in British rivers, using macroinvertebrate data. Therefore, the LIFE technique was one of the obvious candidate tools to adapt for use in Irish rivers as part of this project.”

Project Manager, Martin Gammell
One of the macroinvertebrate survey sites used in this project, on the River Flesk in County Kerry.
One of the macroinvertebrate survey sites used in this project, on the River Flesk in County Kerry.

How Macroinvertebrates Reflect Flow Conditions

Because different macroinvertebrate species have varying flow preferences, the macroinvertebrate community at a site can reveal information about flow conditions at that site, and changes in the macroinvertebrate community can reveal information about changes in flow. As flow velocities decline, there should be an increase in the abundance of macroinvertebrates associated with slower velocities, and a decrease in the abundance of macroinvertebrates associated with faster velocities. This link between the macroinvertebrates at a site and its flow history formed the basis for the development of the LIFE technique, and LIFE scores have been found to have strong correlations with measured flows in British rivers, with higher LIFE scores indicating faster flows.

A whirligig beetle (Family Gyrinidae), typical of slower-flowing and standing waters.
A whirligig beetle (Family Gyrinidae), typical of slower-flowing and standing waters.

“The LIFE method can use species-level or family-level data. Because we considered it important that LIFE scores could be calculated using standard data collected by the EPA as part of their river monitoring programmes, we chose to focus primarily on the family-level version of the index. However, due to differences between the British and Irish macroinvertebrate fauna, the British family-level version of the index is not entirely appropriate for Ireland. Therefore, an important first step in this project was to adapt the index for Ireland, and as a result of this work, appropriate family-level LIFE scores can now be calculated for Irish rivers.”

Project Manager, Martin Gammell

Survey Results and National Patterns

The macroinvertebrate data used in this project were from surveys carried out by the project team in 2021 and 2022 at 47 sites throughout Ireland, as well as from historical EPA macroinvertebrate surveys carried out between 2007 and 2018. The macroinvertebrate survey data was matched with river flow data recorded at nearby hydrometric stations on the same river, to investigate the strength of the relationship between calculated LIFE scores and measured river flows.

“Our results were very encouraging. We found strong positive relationships between calculated LIFE scores and measured river flows, and at a number of the sites that we surveyed, calculated LIFE scores closely tracked changes in flow at the site. We also examined the distribution of LIFE scores throughout the country, and as expected, lower LIFE scores were concentrated in lowland areas and higher LIFE scores were concentrated in upland areas. The adapted family-level LIFE technique is therefore a useful tool for monitoring potential impacts of changes in flow on macroinvertebrate communities in Irish rivers.”

Project Manager, Martin Gammell
Overlap of LIFE scores, calculated from five macroinvertebrate surveys at a single monitoring site, with flow measurements from that monitoring site’s matching hydrometric station. In Panel A, LIFE scores were plotted against the exact dates on which the macroinvertebrate surveys were carried out. Panel B shows the same data as Panel A, but with LIFE scores plotted against dates exactly three months earlier than the dates of the macroinvertebrate surveys, demonstrating that LIFE scores closely tracked changes in flow at this site, once the lagged response (approximately three months in this case) of the LIFE scores to flow was taken into account.
Overlap of LIFE scores, calculated from five macroinvertebrate surveys at a single monitoring site, with flow measurements from that monitoring site’s matching hydrometric station. In Panel A, LIFE scores were plotted against the exact dates on which the macroinvertebrate surveys were carried out. Panel B shows the same data as Panel A, but with LIFE scores plotted against dates exactly three months earlier than the dates of the macroinvertebrate surveys, demonstrating that LIFE scores closely tracked changes in flow at this site, once the lagged response (approximately three months in this case) of the LIFE scores to flow was taken into account.
Distribution of median LIFE scores (Panel A) for all EPA river monitoring sites for which macroinvertebrate data were available between 2007 and 2018, compared to the distribution of upland areas (Panel B).
Distribution of median LIFE scores (Panel A) for all EPA river monitoring sites for which macroinvertebrate data were available between 2007 and 2018, compared to the distribution of upland areas (Panel B).

Online Dashboard

The team developed an online dashboard to calculate family-level LIFE scores for Irish rivers, along with two other macroinvertebrate-based hydroecological indices. Access dashboard here: https://mgammell.shinyapps.io/biotic_index_dashboard/

Learn more

www.flowecology.com

Research 493: Biological Tools to Measure the Impact of Flow on Ecology in Irish Rivers | Environmental Protection Agency

You can read more case studies and stories like this in the Catchments Newsletter

Who is involved?

Quite simply, everyone in Ireland has a role to play. This can be from something as simple as making sure you don’t pollute your local stream, or a local community working together to establish a Rivers Trust to enhance the rivers and lakes in their area, to a Government Department or Agency helping a Minister implement a new policy to help protect and enhance all our water bodies.

This website has been developed and is maintained by the Environmental Protection Agency, and is a collaboration between the Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Local Authority Waters Programme.

LAWCO

Local Authority Waters Programme

The Local Authority Waters Programme coordinates the efforts of local authorities and other public bodies in the implementation of the River Basin Management Plan, and supports local community and stakeholder involvement in managing our natural waters, for everyone’s benefit.

EPA

Environmental Protection Agency

The EPA is responsible for coordinating the monitoring, assessment and reporting on the status of our 4,842 water bodies, looking at trends and changes, determining which waterbodies are at risk and what could be causing this, and drafting environmental objectives for each.

DECLG

Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage

The Department is responsible for making sure that the right policies, regulations and resources are in place to implement the Water Framework Directive, and developing a River Basin Management Plan and Programme of Measures to protect and restore our waters.